Estudio comparativo entre deportes simétricos y asimétricos mediante análisis estructural estático en deportistas adolescentes

• Juan J. Ramos-Álvarez ^[1] ; María J. Del Castillo-Campos ^[2] ; Carlos Eduardo Polo Portes ; María T. Lara-Hernández ^[2] ; Elena Jiménez-Herranz ^[1] ; Cristina Naranjo-Ortiz ^[3]
  1. [1] Universidad Complutense de Madrid

     Universidad Complutense de Madrid

     Madrid, España

     
  2. [2] Centro de Medicina del Deporte. Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  3. [3] Universidad Camilo José de Cela. Madrid

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Archivos de medicina del deporte: revista de la Federación Española de Medicina del Deporte y de la Confederación Iberoamericana de Medicina del Deporte, ISSN 0212-8799, Vol. 33, Nº. 172 (Febrero / Marzo), 2016, págs. 98-102
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Comparative study between symmetrical and asymmetrical sports by static structural analysis in adolescent athletes
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    En los exámenes médicos preparticipación deportiva, el análisis de las estructuras anatómicas que no están directamente relacionadas con el deporte en cuestión, suele ser más superficial. Un examen más detallado del aparato locomotor podría revelar la existencia de ciertas anomalías que, en ocasiones pueden pasar desapercibidas. El objetivo de este estudio es describir la prevalencia de trastornos estructurales del aparato locomotor en una población de deportistas adolescentes de élite de la Comunidad de Madrid. Establecer la relación de alteraciones con la práctica de deportes simétricos o asimétricos. Estudio transversal descriptivo. Nivel de evidencia II-III. Nuestra población de estudio incluye deportistas pertenecientes al plan de tecnificación de la Comunidad de Madrid: 102 deportistas, 66 hombres y 36 mujeres con edades comprendidas entre 12 y 19 años. Un grupo control está compuesto por deportistas de natación, deporte considerado simétrico y el segundo grupo por deportistas practicantes de deportes considerados asimétricos: esgrima y bádminton. Los deportistas fueron examinados siguiendo un método cegado por tres diferentes especialistas que utilizaron el mismo protocolo. Se ha empleado el contraste de hipótesis para variables cualitativas, con un nivel de confianza del 95%

  • English

    In pre-participative sports medical examinations, the analysis of the anatomical structures that are not directly related to the sport in question, is usually more superficial. A more detailed assessment of the locomotive system may reveal the existence of certain anomalies, which may occasionally go unnoticed. The aim of this study is to describe the prevalence of structural disorders of the locomotive system among elite-level athletes from the Community of Madrid. To establish the relationship between alterations and practising symmetrical or asymmetrical sports. Descriptive cross-sectional study Level of evidence II-III Our study sample includes athletes that are members of the Community of Madrid Sports Technification Plan. 102 athletes, 66 males and 36 females aged between 12 and 19 years. One control group comprises swimming athletes, a sport considered to be symmetrical, and the second group comprises athletes practising sports considered to be asymmetrical: fencing and badminton. The athletes were examined following a blind method by three different specialists using the same protocol. Hypothesis contrasting has been used for qualitative variables, with a 95% confidence level

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • 1. DeSimone G, Stenger L. Profile of a group exercise participant: health screening tools. In: DeSimone G, ed. ACSM's Resources for the...
  • 2. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity...
  • 3. Chantraine A. Knee joint in soccer players: osteoarthritis and axis deviation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17(4):434-9.
  • 4. Lun V, Meeuwisse WH, Stergiou P, Stefanyshyn D. Relation between running injury and static lower limb alignment in recreational runners....
  • 5. Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries....
  • 6. Wen DY, Puffer JC, Schmalzried TP. Injuries in runners: a prospective study of alignment. Clin J Sport Med. 1998;8(3):187-94.
  • 7. McKellop HA, Llinas A, Sarmiento A. Effects of tibial malalignment on the knee and ankle. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(3):415-23.
  • 8. Dahle LK, Mueller MJ, Delitto A, Diamond JE. Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. J...
  • 9. Brouwer GM, van Tol AW, Bergink AP, Belo JN, Bernsen RM, Reijman M, et al. Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development...
  • 10. Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop DD. The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline...
  • 11. Greulich W, Pyle S. Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. Stanford University Press; 1999.
  • 12. Alexander CJ. Effect of growth rate on the strength of the growth plate-shaft junction. Skeletal Radiology. 1976;1:67-76.
  • 13. Bollinger A. Children and tennis. In: Bollinger A, ed. Get fit for tennis. London: Pelham Books Ltd.; 1982:101-4. Juan J. Ramos-Álvarez,...
  • 14. Arkin AM, Katz JF. The effects of pressure on epiphyseal growth. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1956;38A:1056-76.
  • 15. Swärd L. The Thoracolumbar in young élite athletes. Current concepts on the effects of physical training. Sports Medicine. 1992;13(5):357-64.
  • 16. Schmorl G, Junghans H. The Human Spine in Health and Disease. New York: Grune and Strettan; 1971.
  • 17. Ueno M, Takaso M, Nakazawa T, Imura T, Saito W, Shintani R, et al. A 5-year epidemiological study on the prevalence rate of idiopathic...
  • 18. Watson AW. Posture and participation in sport. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1983;23(3):2319.
  • 19. Jayanthi N, Esser S. Racket sports. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013;12(5):329-36.
  • 20. World, Medical, Association 2014; Pages http://www.wma.net/es/30publications/ 10policies/b3/.2015.
  • 21. Heath CH, Staheli LT. Normal limits of knee angle in white children--genu varum and genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993;13(2):259-62.
  • 22. Arazi M, Ogun TC, Memik R. Normal development of the tibiofemoral angle in children: a clinical study of 590 normal subjects from 3 to...
  • 23. Desai SS, Shetty GM, Song HR, Lee SH, Kim TY, Hur CY. Effect of foot deformity on conventional mechanical axis deviation and ground mechanical...
  • 24. Bussière C, Aït Si Selmi T, Neyret P. Genu recurvatum. Encycl Méd Chir. Appareil locomoteur. 2001;14:327-A-10.
  • 25. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. Journal of Biomechanics. 1987;20:547-51.
  • 26. Razeghi S, Lang T, Behrens R. Influence of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on gastroesophageal reflux: a prospective study in 68 children....
  • 27. Yuing FTA, Almagià AF, Lizana PJ, Rodríguez RFJ, Ivanovic DM, Binvignat GO, et al. Comparison of Two Method for Measuring the Lumbar Curve....
  • 28. Serna L, Santonja F, Pastor A. Clinical exploration of the spine sagital vew. Selección. 1996;5(2):88-102.
  • 29. Cote P, Kreitz BG, Cassidy JD, Dzus AK, Martel J. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's...
  • 30. Bunnell WP. An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(9):1381-7.
  • 31. Scoliosis Research Society 2015; Pageshttp://www.srs.org/.
  • 32. Ward WT, Rihn JA, Solic J, Lee JY. A comparison of the lenke and king classification systems in the surgical treatment of idiopathic thoracic...
  • 33. Bunnell WP. Spinal deformity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986;33(6):1475-87.
  • 34. Fong DY, Lee CF, Cheung KM, Cheng JC, Ng BK, Lam TP, et al. A meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening....
  • 35. Ramos-Álvarez JJ, Del Castillo-Campos MJ, Ramón-Rey ML, Segura JL, Bosch MA. Static structural research study on fencers sponsored by...
  • 36. Mosca VS. Flexible flatfoot in childrem and adolescents. Journal of Children Orthopaedics. 2010;4(2):107-21.
  • 37. Del Castillo-Campos MJ, Ramos-Álvarez JJ, Antelo-Suarez O, Lara-Hernández MT. Prevalencia de escoliosis en deportistas madrileños de élite....
  • 38. Listernick R. A 14-year-old girl with leg length discrepancy. Pediatr Ann. 2012;41(4):138-41.
  • 39. Suh SW, Modi HN, Yang JH, Hong JY. Idiopathic scoliosis in Korean schoolchildren: a prospective screening study of over 1 million children....
  • 40. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Spiezia F, Denaro V. Aetiology and prevention of injuries in elite young athletes. Med Sport Sci. 2011;56:187-200.
  • 41. Schmid AB, Dyer L, Boni T, Held U, Brunner F. Paraspinal muscle activity during symmetrical and asymmetrical weight training in idiopathic...
  • 42. Kenanidis EI, Potoupnis ME, Papavasiliou KA, Sayegh FE, Kapetanos GA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in athletes: is there a connection?...
  • 43. Fields KB, Sykes JC, Walker KM, Jackson JC. Prevention of running injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2010;9(3):176-82.
  • 44. Negrini S, Kenanidis E, Potoupnis ME, Papavasiliou KA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and exercising: is there truly a liaison? Spine...
  • 45. Harvey WF, Yang M, Cooke TD, Segal NA, Lane N, Lewis CE, et al. Association of leg-length inequality with knee osteoarthritis: a cohort...
  • 46. Matusik E, Durmala J, Matusik P, Piotrowski J. Evaluation of nutritional status of children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis:...
  • 47. Azémar G. A propos des affections chroniques imputables a la pratique de l´escrime: scoliose non, coxarthrose peut-etre !. Cinesiologie....
  • 48. Romano M, Minozzi S, Zaina F, Saltikov JB, Chockalingam N, Kotwicki T, et al. Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Cochrane...